1. INTRODUCTION
In addition to being well trained militarily, the Japanese
are deceptive and cunning. They have used obstacles
only on a limited scale thus far in this war
because they have been mostly on the offensive in the
land fighting. As they go more and more on the defensive
in the coming months, the Japs are expected to
use a wide variety of obstacles to block our advances.
Our forces in the Solomon Islands, taking the offensive
on a large scale, had to deal with numerous pit traps,
most of which were mined and cleverly camouflaged.
Most of the information in this section, with the exception
of that concerning road blocks, was taken from
a captured Japanese manual on field fortifications. The
manual does not go into elaborate details about obstacles,
but all the pertinent data available is presented.
2. ROAD BLOCKS
In the Malaya and Burma campaigns, the Japanese
frequently used road blocks to great advantage. Their
success was largely due to these factors: the jungle or
swampy nature of the terrain, the scarcity of roads, the
necessity of the British using the few roads available
because their forces were largely motorized, and the
fact that the Japanese usually outnumbered their opponents.
The blocks, as a general rule, were hastily prepared
and were not very strong. Most of them could be
broken easily by a powerful frontal assault, led or supported
by tanks. Breaking through one barricade, however,
was usually not enough, because the Japanese used
them in series--at Shwedaung, Burma, five barricades
had to be broken on one road before the British could
continue their march. The Japanese also made a practice
of closing in on the roads behind the British, thus
blocking them off from units farther back.
The siting of the Jap road blocks was invariably
good. They were located at points where the road
passed through dense jungle or other enclosed country,
such as rice fields or swamps. The actual blocks or
barricades were always concealed from frontal observation
except at a very short distance. They were
strongly covered by well-sited mortars, light machine
guns, and antitank guns. These weapons were placed
in defiles--behind ridges or in hastily constructed holes
or trenches. The frontage held on each side of the road
was comparatively short, partly owing to the nature of
the country.
To destroy these road blocks and allow uninterrupted
movement of vehicles, matériel, and personnel, the
British in Burma found the following tactics to be
the most feasible:
Because of the jungle nature of the area on both sides of the
road, only strong frontal attacks on a comparatively narrow
front should be attempted. The attack must be carefully prepared
and supported by every ounce of firepower available. It
should be supported by barrage fire from all available artillery
and mortars. Some of these weapons should be available for
searching fire against enemy mortars in case the latter are used.
The infantry should attack in waves with strictly limited objectives,
each wave halting on its objective and taking up an all-around
defensive position to be held until the whole column has
passed. If tanks are available, they should precede each successive
leading wave of infantry at infantry pace. Each leading
wave of infantry must, in its turn, employ shock tactics, combining
grenades with the fire of submachine guns, machine carbines,
and Bren guns, and with the use of bayonets. It is necessary to
capture and hold both sides of the road throughout the area so
that the enemy cannot return to his positions dominating the
route. But because of the jungle terrain, it is not necessary to
hold a wide area on both sides of the road--strips wide enough
to keep the enemy from observing the road are sufficient.
3. ANTITANK
The Jap manual describes two types of tank traps, one a triangular
trench and the other a round one. The round trap, designed to allow
the entire tank to fall into it, requires more effort to construct
than the triangular trench.
"Antitank obstacles are designed to lift up the front
end of the tank and check its advance," the manual
says. "Double-row obstacles may be constructed on
gentle slopes, while single-row obstacles are sufficient on
relatively steeper ground. Tank traps are more easily
discovered on sloping ground if not camouflaged, and
they are more easily destroyed when located."
4. ELECTRIC
Electric obstacles are used mainly to kill or wound
personnel and horses, and to help slow or stop an enemy
offensive.
The obstacles are constructed by technical troops.
The wire usually is strung on dry, barkless poles, or on
poles with all buried parts insulated with asphalt or
coal tar. The wire is connected to a high-tension power
source, which generates 1,000 to 2,000 volts (alternating
current). Transmission wires are sometimes strung
along the ground, or under the ground.
The obstacles are electrified when opposing forces
launch surprise attacks. Ordinarily, the electricity is
off when the opposition is reconnoitering. Occasionally, in
order to deceive, the Japanese turn the current
on during reconnaissances. In an actual attack
following such practices, the Japs turn the current on
in one sector and off in another.
In searching for electrical obstacles put up by the
opposition, the Japs use a detector and make personal
reconnaissances with as much secrecy as possible. According
to their manual, they seek to determine the
voltage used, the location of the electric source, and the
nature of the obstacles.
The Japanese manual says the best way to destroy
electrical obstacles is by the use of explosives, such as
bangalore torpedoes. Other methods include cutting
the wires and shooting them apart with tank fire. "All
broken ends of the wire must be wound around posts or
thrust into the ground so as to cut off the current," the
manual states. "The demolition squads must be provided
with rubber insulating gloves when carrying out
demolitions. In addition, they must use nets, rubber
boots, and other insulating devices in dealing with
urgent demolitions."